This Penn St. study looked at 83 fraud cases from last decade
involving over 400 defendants. As you would expect, women made up only
9% of the defendant pool, so not sure if that was enough to make
statistical conclusions. But half of the male defendants gained
>$500K from their alleged frauds, while half of the female defendants
earned nothing. The women were more often in lower subordinate job
titles too vs. their male co-conspirators.
Females were more likely to occupy accounting/finance positions, and
were not the "ringleaders" or creative force behind the crime. Their
crimes were less likely to be personal profiteering, and instead they
were accused of embellishing #s to make the firm look better or covering
up losses to avoid bankruptcy. So they were doing wrong while "trying
to help someone else", whereas the men were straight up stealing for
themselves (and maybe making their firms some $ too).
Tuesday, August 6, 2013
Gender differences among white collar criminals
Labels:
company,
crime,
fraud,
gender,
glass ceiling,
greed,
men,
penn state,
pew,
white collar,
women
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment