Showing posts with label MMS. Show all posts
Showing posts with label MMS. Show all posts

Friday, May 28, 2010

Krugman's article on Obama and the spill

The Gulf is one of the most productive fishing areas on the planet. Now the industry is screwed for years. Much of Gulf fishing is done by small, immigrant operations that don't have the scale to weather this disaster. If I were them, I would take truckloads of rotting seafood and dump them at BP USA's headquarters. Let's see how they like another industry shitting on their livelihood.

G was kind enough to send me a piece from Krugman about Obama and GOP criticism over his handling of the spill: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/10/opinion/10krugman.html.

Did you see the press conference today? I agree with Krugman that Obama has done about all he reasonably can for the spill. The government doesn't have the know-how or equipment to fix drilling disasters. I guess he could threaten BP and make them hurry up, but based on their track record, do you want to rush a reckless, accident-prone company into another mistake? Obama could have mustered up more anti-spill resources and pulled rank on BP for the cleanup though. Recruit the fishing boats, get all the booms and vacuums you can requisition. Overwhelming force to silence the critics and put people at ease, even if it's not fixing the problem 100%. Apparently 7 nations have offered us help, but we only accepted it from 2: Mexico and Norway (a nation with vast offshore drilling experience in worse waters, yet with a better safety record). But he still did much better than Bush during Katrina.

As Krugman and Obama have said, I don't know why there is such a blanket anti-government sentiment among conservatives. Reagan said government is the problem, but government is the solution (and the unique solution) for many things too. Do they really not care that America lost trillions in wealth due to de-regulation, that hundreds of people are dead due to gutted, corrupt federal inspection agencies, and that we are stuck in 2 un-winnable wars because the separation of powers failed? Bad, dysfunctional government is a problem, so why not fix it instead of weaken it more? They are sending our concept of government to a "death panel". Just because of the Toyota pedal problem, do critics say that all cars are bad and we should do away with them? You can't judge something based on its worst performance (also a critique of our penal system). And you especially can't judge when you set up something to fail beforehand for your own selfish purposes. If they don't want government, then what is their alternative? Every man for himself? We'd just be a nation of paranoid, selfish assholes stealing from and lying to each other. Is that their American dream? Is that conservatism? Freedom must go hand-in-hand with personal responsibility, as any GOP would say. But clearly personal responsibility is fallible, so who is there to enforce it but the government and rule of law?

More on the MMS:

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=127126854

In one case, it was reported that a MMS inspector gave his inspection form to a rep of the company being audited. He filled out the questions in pencil, and the MMS guy just wrote over in pen. Another was being recruited to a company at the very moment that he/she was auditing the company. Needless to say the company passed and he/she got a new job.

Thursday, September 11, 2008

Living large at the Dept. of Interior

So you have federal employees tasked with collecting royalties from oil companies actually partying, accepting gifts, fornicating with, and doing drugs provided by those companies' representatives. And coincidentally or not, many feel that the government is getting shortchanged on resource royalties. Heh, who needs lobbyists when you can just bribe and dope up the tax collectors instead? This exact scandal happened not long ago (1990) at the same department, so obviously they haven't learned their lesson. Yet another consequence of toothless regulation and laissez-faire government.

http://www.presstelegram.com/ci_10437371?source=rss
Oil brokers sex scandal may affect drilling debate
By H. Joseph Herbert The Associated Press
Article Launched: 09/11/2008 10:05:03 AM PDT

WASHINGTON - A scandal involving sex, drugs and - uh, offshore oil drilling.

It's a strange mix, and it couldn't have come at a worse time for those in Congress pressing to expand oil and gas development off America's beaches while trying to stave off an election-year rush by Democrats to impose new taxes and royalties on the oil industry.

An Interior Department investigation describing a "culture of substance abuse and promiscuity" by workers at the agency that issues offshore drilling leases and collects royalties hit lawmakers Wednesday just as they prepared for votes next week on expanding offshore drilling.

"On the eve of Congress starting this big debate you've got a horror story of mismanagement and misconduct in programs that are going to be a key part of the discussion," Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., said in an interview, adding that it can't help but influence the debate.

The two-year, $5.3 million investigation by Interior's inspector general found workers at the Minerals Management Service's royalty collection office in Denver partying, having sex, using drugs and accepting gifts and ski trips and golf outings from energy company representatives with whom they did government business. The investigations exposed "a culture of ethical failure" and an agency rife with conflicts of interest, Inspector General Earl E. Devaney said.

Between 2002 and 2006, 19 oil marketers - nearly a third of the Denver office staff
- received gifts and gratuities from oil and gas companies, including Chevron Corp., Shell, Hess Corp. and Denver-based Gary-Williams Energy Corp., the investigators found.

"Employees frequently consumed alcohol at industry functions, had used cocaine and marijuana, and had sexual relationships with oil and natural gas company representatives" who referred to some of the government workers as the "MMS Chicks."

The director of the royalty program had a consulting job on the side for a company that paid him $30,000 for marketing its services to various oil and gas companies, the report said. MMS Director Randall Luthi said in an interview the agency was taking the report "extremely seriously" and would weigh taking appropriate action in coming months.

Interior Secretary Dirk Kempthorne in a statement released Thursday vowed to take swift action, saying that he was "outraged by the immoral behavior, illegal activities and appalling misconduct of several former and long-serving career employees."

"We must and we will eliminate any remaining negative elements in the Minerals Management Service," Kempthorne said.

"This IG report has it all - sex, drugs and the Bush administration officials once again in cahoots with Big Oil," said Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., whose Joint Economic Committee released a report last year claiming the Minerals Management Service has failed to collect millions of dollars in oil royalties.

Republicans and Democrats promised further scrutiny of the Interior Department agency which last year handled $4.3 billion in royalty-in-kind payments from energy companies drilling on federal lands. Under the program oil companies give the government oil in lieu of cash and the MMS office in turn sells the oil on the open market. Sen. Jeff Bingaman, D-N.M., chairman of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, said the IG report "raises very serious questions" about the royalty collection process, something especially troublesome "given the potential for expanded domestic drilling." He said some basic reforms in the royalty-in-kind program should be included in drilling legislation.

Wyden said the program should be suspended to "clean house" at the federal agency and "bring back the process of rigorous audits and accountability."

House Democrats on Wednesday offered a broader drilling proposal than they had floated previously. It would lift all moratoria on drilling 100 miles from shore and allow energy development beyond 50 miles from the coast if a state agrees. Waters closer than 50 miles would continue to be protected.

The drilling measure is part of a broader energy package that also would roll back tax breaks for the largest oil companies and require them to pay additional royalties, with the money to be used to spur renewable energy programs and conservation.

House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, D-Md., called it "a strong bill that will increase responsible drilling and invest in renewable energy" and said those criticizing it would "rather have a political issue."

But House Republican leader John Boehner, R-Ohio, accused the Democrats of "trying to pull a hoax on the American people." He said the plan would result "in little or no new American energy production" because states would share no royalties and have little financial incentives to allow drilling.

The Senate, meanwhile, is expected next week to take up several drilling proposals, including one that would open waters off the Atlantic from Virginia to Georgia and the eastern Gulf off Florida to drilling but keep the bans in place elsewhere. That plan also would allow for a 50-mile coastal buffer.

---

Associated Press writer Dina Cappiello contributed to this report.

---

On the Net:

Office of the Inspector General: www.doioig.gov