South Carolinians re-elected Mark Sanford, the devout
evangelical who lied about his tryst to South America to see his
mistress (he may have used public funds during his affair too, like John
Edwards). So Sanford is an inspiration redemption story, but Clinton is
still the antichrist (and I bet Sanford went past 3rd base).
Of all the eligible people for this office, is Sanford truly
the best choice for the people and the country? Just as we often don't
make the best choices when it comes to commerce, relationship, and jobs,
I guess you can't expect people to make the optimal voting decisions
either.
--------
And look at the other fools we've elected to write our laws and budgets and declare wars:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?
The Broun vs. Bachmann matchup from May 10 is pretty funny too (not on YT yet).
Great
idea to appoint a guy to the House Science Cmte. who believes there is
evidence proving the Earth is 9,000 years old. I can't believe they gave
this guy a medical license too (well he comes from rural GA, where the
holy water is considered a pharmaceutical). http://www.huffingtonpost.com/
No comments:
Post a Comment