First of all, weed in WA and CO!!!
http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-na-pn-marijuana-votes-20121106,0,3992024.story?track=rss
I'll just comment on the election and politics here, not necessarily
on the merits of each party's philosophies and policy agendas.
I
can't remember the last time I felt so proud of the American people.
Personally, I think this is bigger than 2008 considering the current
political environment. Voters rejected the GOP's schizophrenic
candidate, as well as their policies of exclusion, obstruction,
wealth/power inequality, obsolete beliefs, and scapegoating the wrong
people for America's problems.
And ironically, the electoral college is now working in the Dem's
favor! Romney almost won the popular vote but got wiped out in electoral
votes. But now there are "structural" advantages for the Dems in terms
of electoral vote distributions, similar to what the GOP enjoyed from
Nixon to Bush Sr.
We worried that Cit. Utd. would change politics forever, and I do
believe it had a noticeable effect. But Obama's campaign is the most
sophisticated and effective grassroots, micro-donation, new media
machine we've ever seen (and it's a platform that they can hopefully
transfer to future candidates and continue to have an advantage vs. the
GOP on). In the end, that beat out the Adelson, Koch, Trump, and Rove
led money and misinformation blitz. Outside groups have to pay a higher
fee for TV ads than campaigns, so $1 of money raised by Obama2012
equaled about $1.50-2.00 of Super PAC money. So once again, the GOP
miscalculated. Everyone (but Nate Silver) predicted that the young
people, poor, and minorities (who turned out in record numbers for Obama
in 2008) are now disillusioned and unlikely to show up for Obama like
that again. Well they did, and even more so for Latinos.
But still, about as many people voted for Romney as Obama. A lot of
white males, older folks, and the wealthy. Maybe the GOP will realize
that America is not like "Leave it to Beaver" anymore and those groups
are not enough to guarantee a win each time, but I doubt it. They chose
Ryan over Rubio or a woman (and he didn't even deliver WI). Well, the
Ryan pick was kind of forced by the nomination of Romney - clearly not
the GOP's first choice. I guess Christie wanted to wait until Obama was
termed out to give it a shot, probably a smart move.
So did the "core strengths" of the GOP actually cause them to lose
here? It gained them money but cost them votes, and fortunately votes
still determine our leaders. The Tea Party, ties to big business, and
pro-Israel lobby became liabilities. Most Americans do not feel directly
threatened by Iran, do not believe that Israel will be attacked any
time soon, and care more about domestic issues. Our foreign policy is
far from comfortable, but Osama is dead, America is tired of war, and
the focus on these narrow issues to placate their big donors and the
hawks didn't persuade many voters who weren't already sure votes for
Romney.
How about big business? A private equity mega-millionaire who
outsourced jobs to China and didn't support the auto bailout may not be
the most convincing messenger for the conservative solution to economic
growth. Despite the latent displeasure with Obama over the economy, the
"supply side" argument didn't gain traction among non-core GOP voters.
And it's not really a great strategy to persuade disillusioned
independents and liberals to vote for you when you accuse half the
country of being lazy bozos with their hands out (the veterans, elderly,
marginalized?), and when you accuse a key growth demographic (Latinos)
of stealing jobs and undermining our recovery.
And then there's the Tea Party. They energized the GOP and thumped
the Dems in 2010, but became a liability now. The are too regressive,
intolerant, exclusive, and hateful - just not very pleasant people you
want to associate with. A lot of presidential elections is about getting
casual or infrequent voters out for you. These folks have more
centrist, timid views - which is of course anathema to the TP. They
aren't winning friends and turning off a lot of key voters with stuff
like:
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/07/opinion/friedman-hope-and-change-part-two.html?ref=opinion&_r=0
