Wednesday, November 30, 2011

The future of digital privacy and Constitutional rights

Doesn't look good: http://www.npr.org/2011/11/30/142714568/interpreting-the-constitution-in-the-digital-era

And clearly this professor isn't a paranoid and alarmist Chicken Little, when major mobile companies are not only monitoring your location 24/7, but recording ALL YOUR KEYSTROKES ALL THE TIME:

http://news.yahoo.com/smartphone-spying-204933867.html

When an external party tries to do this to us on our PCs, they call it malware (possibly illegal). When our mobile providers do it without our knowledge, they call it "enhancing the user experience."  I'm tired of these big data firms just telling us to "trust them" that they'll use all this info responsibly. And of course we can't expect the gov't to look after our interests on this issue, because they are way behind the tech curve, and the courts tend to side with the corporations and free speech argument. With data mining methods and tech tools only getting smarter and more ubiquitous, where are we headed?

Thursday, November 10, 2011

The agencies getting Chinese students into US colleges (often by cheating)

http://marketplace.publicradio.org/display/web/2011/11/09/pm-chinese-students-too-qualified-to-be-true

With the one-child policy "little emperors" in China growing up into adulthood, their doting parents want to do everything they can to get their kids accepted into the best Western schools, even at the cost of $7K to top "placement" agencies. These agencies have a lot of money and reputation on the line, so they do what needs to be done to please customers. Whistleblowers claim that they wrote entire college apps for about 75% of clients. When a Wisconsin school was informed of an investigation concerning their recruiting partner in China, Shanghai Shenyuan, they immediately terminated their relationship.

I know that those with means are entitled to press their advantages in order to beat the competition, and a little tutoring or coaching is fine. But outright fraud, so they take admission spots away from honest, hard-working students who gave full effort (American, Chinese, or otherwise), is just outrageous. But these are the times we live in. And I guess some colleges aren't as rigorous as they should be to check on foreign students' credentials, because they get full tuition from a Chinese student instead of the discounted in-state rate. And yes, I know American students cheat plenty too (NY SAT scandal: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/10/nyregion/sat-cheating-inquiry-on-long-island-expands-to-include-act.html), but it's not as blatant as this:

A report by consulting firm Zinch China seems to confirm [this fraud]. Zinch advises American colleges and universities on recruiting Chinese students. The firm interviewed agents and admissions consultants, as well as more than 200 Beijing students headed to U.S. schools. Zinch estimates 90 percent of these students submitted false recommendation letters; 70 percent had other people write their personal essays, and half of them submitted forged high school transcripts. Two former employees of a college placement agency told Marketplace they routinely falsified application materials. We did not use their names, because they feared they would lose their current jobs... There are numerous colleges that are having difficulty assuring the integrity of the essays, transcripts and credentials, coming from other countries, and in particular in Asia.

-Marketplace

Currently 1/5 of all foreign students in the US are from China, totaling over 130,000. You can check marketplace.org today for the 2nd part of this story - what is going down on the US side of the issue. As I am starting an MBA program, I know that it's pretty bad for b-schools too (what do you expect from the future execs and who will lie and cheat their way to the top?) :). Despite clear warnings that it is a violation of school honor code, I estimate that many applicants ghost-write or team up with their managers to draft letters of rec. Bosses are busy, and it reflects well on them to get their reports into top schools, so I guess they are OK with it. I recently heard complaints from peers that the writing abilities of some of our classmates are like middle-school level (the parties in question happen to be Chinese-born, but not making any generalizations). Clearly that level of writing on an admission essay won't cut it for top schools, so they either got help or magically forgot their English in a year. And then there's the GMAT. I had to give a thumb-print, e-sign, and show my driver's license to use the bathroom during test breaks. Is the GMAC test firm just paranoid? Apparently not: http://www.businessweek.com/bschools/content/dec2009/bs2009123_558900.htm (again, China is implicated here).

But the whole system is just out of control. College is a major determinant for future prosperity and happiness. Demand vastly exceeds supply for top education, and even more so for good employment. Any leg up a young person can get may help. But the ludicrous costs associated with college acceptance/tuition make wealth, not student merit/potential, the major driver of admission - and that's not how a meritocracy is supposed to work. But some cash-strapped schools are thinking about future alumni giving, so would they rather hook up a trust fund baby, or take their chances on a bright kid out of the inner city who wants to major in ethnic studies? I guess we have to get real regarding what college is about. Forget their idealistic mission statements and credos. It's not about inspiring the brightest young minds to make the big contributions that better humanity. It's about giving already privileged people the skills and connections necessary to do even better after graduation, which will augment the school's marketing, reputation, and endowment. Yes I know I'm being harsh, but this successful cheating industry would not exist if schools were serious about academic integrity, so I blame them more than the Chinese or whoever. Well, university trustees, professors, and coaches lie, steal, and cheat too, so I shouldn't be surprised if students just follow their authority figure role models. Cheaters may be in the minority overall, but like we discussed about Greek tax evasion - when the honest people see that the corrupt can do as they please with impunity, what's in it for them to remain honest?

Wednesday, November 9, 2011

How the Greek elites contributed to the crisis

More on Greek socioeconomic problems: http://www.theworld.org/2011/11/the-oligarchs-of-greece/

Sadly, it's a familiar story. The most powerful 30 or so families in Greece have drastically augmented their wealth in the last couple decades. Due to deregulation and whatnot, they bought up most of the nation's mass media in order to influence the mainstream population into supporting their agenda. In addition, they of course bought politicians, especially from Papandreou's opposition: the more conservative New Democracy party. Papandreou's PASOK socialist party is also infiltrated with pro-rich stooges, who along with the conservatives have fought Papandreou's tax reform efforts to curtail evasion by the rich (twisting the issue as Papandreou wanting to put the squeeze on all Greeks). And as Papandreou is now trying to do right for the country and not just serving the oligarchs or EU powers, he will soon be out of a job and probably replaced by a company man. 

As with the US deficit debate, a Greek solution has to include some cuts and some new revenues. In both nations, the rich are waging a propaganda war to block tax reform, claiming the usual nonsense that it will "kill jobs and hurt the hard-working small business owner," when really they're just looking after their own finances at the expense of the 99%. But if the rich in Greece paid their fair share, LITERALLY they would not have a fiscal crisis in the long term. Though as we've discussed, it's a structural problem and they've dug such a hole for themselves now that it's probably too late to avoid default, even if evasion was magically eradicated.

Bottom line, the riots aren't the problem, and "bloated public sector pay & services" isn't either. They are red herrings of the underlying breakdown in the social contract between citizens and government. Some say you can't blame the rich for all our problems, but in Greece's case it's fairly accurate. If the rich believed in good government, they have to power to put the people in place to make it happen. But they prosper from dysfunction, injustice, and lack of accountability, so that's what the people get. The Greek case should be a major warning to Americans, but unfortunately many Americans can't locate Greece on a map (I admit that I've been following only recently). We keep hearing from US leaders and pundits that "we're not Greece," implying that we exhibit some of their problems but we're inherently better able to solve them, because we're Americans. I'm not so sure anymore. It most certainly is class warfare there and here, except it's the rich who have declared war on the rest, and they're winning and pressing their advantage. Knowing this, who's crazier: the folks rioting in the streets, or those who stay home and just accept it?

Monday, November 7, 2011

Whom to blame for the Greek crisis: lazy Greeks or greedy Goldman?

http://www.gregpalast.com/lazy-ouzo-swilling-olive-pit-spitting-greeksor-how-goldman-sacked-greece/

It is very ignorant and bigoted for people to knee-jerk blame the Greek crisis on the Greek people. If Greeks were somehow predisposed to be lazy, foolish, and profligate, then this crisis would have happened much earlier, and more often, to them. I don't know Greek economic history, but I doubt that is the case (and probably the boom-bust cycle has been worse on the average American since 1900). On the other hand, Argentina had a recent debt crisis, and now they are prospering (amazingly, mostly due to soybean exports to China). Industrial titans like Japan and Korea did too (and Japan still hasn't come out of its funk) - do we think of them as lazy? Despite our assumptions, even the US has defaulted in the past. Check out the below list of sovereign defaults over history - in fact the Greeks are far from being the worst culprits. It's ironic that France-Germany (who now tsk-tsk Greece as they hold the EU purse-strings) have had more defaults than Greece, probably due to their higher propensities to wage war.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sovereign_default

The common denominators in recent sovereign debt crises were deregulation (as a part of overall lax gov't oversight and risky growth) plus greedy-as-hell foreign investment banks. The average honest people had nothing to do with it, just like the US subprime crisis. Sure they were complicit in it and didn't have the foresight to stop it, but neither did most PhD economists, gov't ministers, and big-time investors, until it was too late. Blaming the common people is a shameful cop-out, like blaming the victims of Katrina. The ordinary Greeks will suffer unfairly and terribly from the proposed austerity measures, paying for the sins of their leaders and offering their pound of flesh to satisfy the foreign banks' bottom lines. And as we well know by now, austerity is just about the worst thing you can impose on a fragile, recessionary economy - unless you just want to restructure (read: blow up the system) and start anew with a leaner model.

Markets are getting saturated, and it's harder for these big banks to exploit inefficiencies and reap easy profits from "traditional investing", since it's become more transparent, computerized, and global. So they had to "innovate" and get into new markets like pay-day loans, student, and sovereign debt. Now aggregate student debt in the US is even larger than credit card debt! Sharks like Goldman don't ignore such untapped opportunities. For sovereign debt, the Greek crisis is only news because the risk got spread to so many key players (via CDS's) that it is threatening the EU and global economy. But "vulture funds" (and even USAID) have been raping the Third World for years, and some still are with impunity. It's really sick, and the short-sellers are making it even harder to rescue distressed nations.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confessions_of_an_Economic_Hit_Man
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vulture_funds

Also, here is an interview of Michael Lewis' new book about the Greek crisis and the "new Third World" emerging:

http://www.npr.org/2011/10/04/140948138/how-the-financial-crisis-created-a-new-third-world

---------

Definitely not to defend Goldman Sachs in this case (they are pretty much guilty as charged), but Greece has spent about 50% of the time since 1800 in a state of default (i.e. not repaying its debts in full). That number puts it about in banana republic territory: http://blogs.reuters.com/the-deep-end/2011/05/12/why-a-greek-default-wouldnt-be-news/

I think what this global crisis has taught us is that financial "innovation" and deregulation has allowed previously self-contained types of problems (locally overvalued housing markets, sovereign defaults of small states) to spread like wildfire as banks that would have previously had no exposure to these events are now hopelessly intertwined (and are often the same as!) with over-leveraged players making all-in bets on the outcomes of these seemingly minor economic events.

---------

 To add to that the link that shows the US and many other western nations defaulting was based from a paper on domestic debt.  The unique thing here is the interconnectedness of Greece's, and really, the worlds debt.  No first world nation has defaulted on its debt since about WW1 and they reduced their domestic debt.

additionally...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_of_Greece#Eurozone_entry
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_of_Greece#Taxation_and_tax_evasion

from the tax evasion link...in 2005 it was estimated that evasion was at 49%.  2012 tax revenue is expected to be 52.7 billion.  Their predicted debt in 2012 will be ~ 350 billion.  So...if there evasion is in the range of 40-50% we are talking about their annually losing the ability to pay off 10% or more of their TOTAL debt.  This is based ONLY on tax evasion.  They are certainly not lazy but they are apparently unwilling to personally pay for the government benefits they are rioting in the streets to keep. 

---------

 More from here: http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2011/11/the-only-leader-who-understood-greeces-real-problem-is-resigning/248018/

I think M (and the article above) are basically right, that there is a broken social compact between the people and the state. I think the reasons are more complex than the article states - Greece has been beset by a long history of conflict between the extreme left and the extreme right (and foreign intervention on top of it), so there is probably less unity-we are all in this together and more of we don't trust the government/other side than in most other European countries.

However, Greece and other countries have been down this road before (see T's account of the history of sovereign defaults) - getting Greece back to sustainable debt levels requires writing off about the same amount of debt the US had to write off for the S&L scandal 20 years ago (some $100 billion dollars) - not chump change in the slightest but it should be digestible to the world financial system.

 The problem is that this time, the banks that hold the debt are so undercapitalized that writing off the debt might mean that they fail, and if BNP Paribas or some other major Euro bank were to fail, that might be the start of Lehman: Euro Edition. It's a typical story in this financial crises - banks getting bigger that their failure would be a systemic risk, yet at the same time they got bigger, they grew more heavily leveraged and *less* capitalized.

So now the question is who pays. Greece, as amply noted, can't pay it's current debt load even if it implemented the Euro Central Bank's dream austerity package. The Euro banks that hold most of the Greek notes can't afford to pay by writing off the debts. The French and German taxpayers, probably the only ones that can really afford to put up the money to cover Greek debt, definitely don't want to pay. No one can force any of the other parties to actually pay, so you have this continual kicking of the can down the road as each party slowly accepts bits of responsibility for taking the hit.

The blame here, as with the case of most of the financial crisis, is largely diffuse. Of course the Greeks shouldn't have been so profligate in their spending, but who's the bigger sucker - the irresponsible spender or the fool that lent him the money? The banks shoulder a lot of the blame, as they should be secure enough to suffer the (relatively) modest kind of hit that this default brings on. On the other hand, it's tough for a bank to be capitalized enough to survive a major world financial crisis and then a major developed European economy lying for years about its credit worthiness (i.e. Greece was lying about its debt levels for years).

Mostly, though, I think this is an indictment of the political failings of the EU as an institution. The S&L crisis forced the US taxpayer to intervene and eat a lot of bad debts, but the US did it and the financial system survived. The buck has to stop somewhere and now that the disaster has occurred you need resolute leadership that can save the system first and sort out who to prosecute/blame later. The EU lacks this, and hence why you have a major run on the other PIIGS, as investors are getting nervous that if the EU can't deal with the relatively small case of Greece, if Italy or Spain were to get in trouble you really would get a major financial meltdown in Europe.

---------

Thanks, Gents. I agree that Greece isn't a model of fiscal responsibility, but the mistake was the EC's lack of due diligence before granting them EU membership. The guy who bets on the Clippers to win the championship doesn't get to blame the Clippers when they predictably fall short. Not that I'm accusing you of this, but blanket blame of "the Greek people" is ridiculous (and much more negative media coverage of Greek rioters vs. their stupid creditors is a form of implicit blame I think). Sure the Greeks don't have the reputation of being efficiency freaks like the Germans or workaholics like Americans/Koreans, but they are not a bunch of freeloaders on welfare either. And even if they were, that shouldn't be enough to compromise the entire EU and send global markets reeling at the mention of a referendum vote. 

http://finance.yahoo.com/blogs/daily-ticker/tax-cheats-cost-uncle-sam-3-trillion-cost-173224779.html

Yes, tax evasion is a problem - and it is a problem in many stronger economies besides Greece. Tax evasion in the US (mostly by businesses and the rich of course) costs us about $3T/year. And that is on top of the very generous and misplaced tax deductions and other perks that are 100% legal. US federal tax revenue in recent history is about 20% GDP, so if US GDP was $14.7T in 2010, that means we collected about $2.94T in taxes. So America's evasion % is similar to that of Greece! Bottom line, people will pay less if they can get away with it. Poorly structured tax laws and incentive programs have led to the behavior we're witnessing, either in the US or Greece. And like here, the majority of the Greek evasions is from the upper class parking their earnings in Swiss banks and whatnot. The people rioting in the streets are not the big culprits. So for sure, Greece is getting assaulted from outside creditors now, but their own elites have been screwing them for decades, with their dysfunctional gov't complicit most of the time. But no one held a gun to Soc Gen's head to make them loan Greece money (just like Countrywide approving a $400K mortgage to a part-time janitor). They should have known better, but the incentives and controls were all out of whack.

"[Greeks] are apparently unwilling to personally pay for the government benefits they are rioting in the streets to keep." Maybe true, but they are definitely not the only ones. Again, if the rich paid "their fair share", a lot of these problems wouldn't be as severe. But the elites and big financial institutions pushed gov't around and ultimately got their way at the expense of "the 99%". Like the Colonial Era, I find it so maddening that the big powers (used to be empires, now are financial institutions) are engaged in this global rivalry, where they don't care how many nations and peoples they destroy just to win the game. An honest Greek won't be able to retire in security, or a disabled American won't be able to get a caretaker, just because some asshole banker met his insane quarterly returns target and expects his big bonus.

Here's a Stanford study ranking nations for sov. fiscal responsibility:

http://www.scribd.com/doc/52927424/Sovereign-Fiscal-Responsibility-Index-2011

Greece is #34 of the 34 OECD+BRIC nations analyzed, while the US is #28 (if we fully implement the Fiscal Commission's debt reduction plans, we'll jump to #8 according to them). The best nations are AUS, NZ, EST, SWE, CHINA, and LUX. But those nations are not like fundamentally more budget-savvy or anything. Some of it was lucky timing. AUS, NZ, and EST all had fiscal issues a decade or two ago during a worldwide growth economy, so they restructured during generally fat years (when we didn't have a shortage of credit, capitalized banks, and economic confidence) and are now better positioned to weather the current storm. CHINA is a singular case protected by surplus from their exports. LUX is just a small, rich country filled with rich people, so they don't need much gov't spending. SWE has very high tax rates and is one of the most high-functioning societies in history. Turn back the clock and give Greece some of these favorable conditions, and maybe we'd have a much different result. And in a couple decades, this list is probably going to look very different.

But like A said, if tiny Greece is causing this much disruption to the EU, I wonder how they will handle the rest of PIIGS and their almost certain default issues in the near future. Or maybe if we're glass-half-full types, the lessons the EU learned from the Greece crisis (assuming a positive outcome) will allow them to better handle the future ones? But I worry that after the US S&L crisis, the financial players and their gov't minions took notice, and then set about to do everything they could to avoid a repeat. Their behavior only grew riskier, but now they have structurally insulated themselves from punishment (either legal or financial), in general.

Thursday, November 3, 2011

"The Great Tech War of 2012"

http://www.fastcompany.com/magazine/160/tech-wars-2012-amazon-apple-google-facebook

I liked this article about the rivalries between Facebook-Apple-Google-Amazon in the "post-PC world", since these giants are invading each other's traditional territories to capture more customers and revenue. All 4 firms seem to really be leaning on their IT and data mining resources in order to personalize their offerings, understand/predict preferences, and reach more consumers. They are using data to increase usage/consumption, which leads to more customer data being generated, which leads to more insight on how to boost future consumption, and on it goes.

But I think TV is the final frontier that these firms still haven't been able to crack. It's such a big market with entrenched players, different rules, and so many viewers/dollars at stake. We'll see which of them (if any) can best integrate their products with the new web-enabled TV future that they claim is supposed to come soon. And there will also be competition and interference from banks, cable, and telcos, whose infrastructure enables all this online activity and consumption, and who are probably tired of seeing the riches and glory go to Silicon Valley. It will also be interesting to see what disruptive upstarts can put these former startups on the defensive.

I didn't realize that Google bought Android, and didn't develop it in-house. What posers! :)

Who knew that bankers, statisticians, and programmers would eventually rule the world? If you told that to Rockefeller and Carnegie back in the day, they would have choked on their Cuban cigars. And the day is not far off when the Si Valley giants are going to get into defense (probably software, but possibly hardware too!).